Strategies for social responsibility and sustainability: a comparative study from a planning perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47606/ACVEN/PH0282

Keywords:

Organisational impact, Sustainable planning, Social responsibility, Sustainability in private organisations

Abstract

A comparative analysis was carried out based on the impact generated by the planning of the sustainability strategy on the sustainable performance of an oil company based in Ecuador, distinguishing between two strategies: Social Responsibility (2008-2014) and sustainability under the GRI approach (2015-2022). Six dimensions (23 indicators) were explored, assessed on an ordinal scale. The contrast was based on the Wilcoxon test and the differences were validated with the effect size, using Cohen's scale. The results reveal a medium impact (Md: 2), from which it follows that the benchmark indicators are consistently met. The results indicate a medium impact (Md: 2), which reflects a systematic compliance with the attributes assessed and reflected in the report, highlighting extensive information on them. Statistical contrast showed that the two strategies for measuring sustainable performance, have had a relevant impact, which reflects a good level of compliance with the goals established in the planning. The groups showed significant differences, which reveals that the company has had a favourable escalation in terms of performance, something that has been ratified with both strategies. The statistic, reflects the existence of a high impact for the contrasting groups. The findings invite further exploration of the issue of sustainability planning in companies in other fields. As new perspectives, it would also be necessary to explore whether these results are also found when applying broader GRI frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar Benítez, S., Barrera Roldán, A., Nava Nava, M. M., Ortíz Gallarza, S. M., Saldivar Valdéz, A., & Villaseñor González, E. (2009). Índice de sustentabilidad industrial: Refinería “Miguel Hidalgo”. Problemas del Desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía, 35(137). https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2004.137.7535

Alaña Castillo, T. P., Capa Benítez, L. B., & Sotomayor Pereira, J. G. (2017). Desarrollo sostenible y evolución de la legislación ambiental en las MiPymes del ecuador. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 9(1), 91-99. Recuperado en 06 de noviembre de 2023, de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2218-36202017000100013&lng=es&tlng=es

Bathrinath, S., Abuthakir, N., Koppiahraj, K., Saravanasankar, S., Rajpradeesh, T., & Manikandan, R. (2021). An initiative towards sustainability in the petroleum industry: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 7798-7802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.330

Beltrán, L. S., Morales, L. F. B., Moraga, R. E. G., Morales, F. A. B., & Lobera, M. E. S. (2019). Motivos para adoptar la sustentabilidad en los negocios. Agricultura Sociedad y Desarrollo, 16(3), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v16i3.1236

Bonisoli, L., Galdeano, E., Piedra, L., & Pérez, J. C. (2019). Benchmarking agri-food sustainability certifications: Evidences from applying SAFA in the Ecuadorian banana agri-system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117579. Doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.054

Briones, V. H., Apolinario, R. E., & Benavides, L. D. (2020). El balance social empresarial en las Pymes del Ecuador. Revista Científica FIPCAEC, 5(18), 175-194. Doi:10.23857/fipcaec.v5i18.207

Bustamante, M. E., Chong, C. A. B., & Bustamante, V. E. C. (2020). Análisis de los informes de responsabilidad social empresarial que influyen en la relación entre stakeholder y la calidad de la sociedad corporativa. UCE Ciencia. Revista de postgrado, 8(1), Article 1. http://uceciencia.edu.do/index.php/OJS/article/view/187

Canto, N. R. do, Verschoore, A. C. D., Dias, P., & Barcellos, M. D. de. (2020). CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND INNOVATION: A MULTIPLE CASE STUDY WITH BRAZILIAN COMPANIES. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 14(1), 93-113. Doi:10.24857/rgsa.v14i1.2189

Casas, J. B.-D. las, & Pérez, M. (2016). El ISO 9001 y TQM en las empresas de Ecuador. Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness & Governability / Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad / Revista de Globalização, Competitividade e Governabilidade, 10(3), 153-176. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=511854477006

Caycho, T., Ventura, J., & Castillo, R. (2016). Magnitud del efecto para la diferencia de dos grupos en ciencias de la salud. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 39(3), 459-461. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1137-66272016000300017&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

Coe, R., & Soto, C. M. (2003). Magnitud del Efecto: Una guía para investigadores y usuarios. Revista de Psicología, 21(1), 145-177. Doi:10.18800/psico.200301.006

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Corretgé, R., & Miret, J. (2018). Adaptación de los estándares GRI y creación de indicadores de RSU: Un trabajo conjunto de la Universitat de Barcelona y la Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 12(1), 137-155. Doi:10.19083/ridu.12.710

Domínguez, S. (2018). Magnitud del efecto, una guía rápida. Educación Médica, 19(4), 251-254. Doi:10.1016/j.edumed.2017.07.002

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. Doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. Doi:10.3758/BF03193146

Fernández-González, R., Puime-Guillén, F., & Vila-Biglieri, J. E. (2023). Environmental strategy and the petroleum industry: A sustainability balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 13(2), 763-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01543-9

Flores, B., Reyes, V. M., & Ezcurra, G. (2022). Responsabilidad Social Empresarial y sostenibilidad en el sector bancario. Revista de Investigación, 46(106), 14-36. https://revistas.upel.edu.ve/index.php/revinvest

García, M. (2017). Gestión de la responsabilidad corporativa: Analisis del sector electrico mexicano. Innovaciones de Negocios, 4(7), Article 7. http://revistainnovaciones.uanl.mx/index.php/revin/article/view/181

Gayatri, S., Gasso, V., & Vaarst, M. (2016). Assessing Sustainability of Smallholder Beef Cattle Farming in Indonesia: A Case Study Using the FAO SAFA Framework. Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(3), p236. Doi:10.5539/jsd.v9n3p236

Global Reporting Initiative (2018). Global Reporting. Globalreporting.org. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Spanish-G4-Part-One.pdf

Gonzabay, J. C., Reyes, V. M., Herrera, G. A., Deza, C. A., Rojas, V. W., & Sequera, A. G. (2020). Análisis de la sostenibilidad de una empresa de caña de azúcar en Ecuador. Research, Society and Development, 9(11), e76091110538-e76091110538. Doi:10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10538

Hahn, R. (2013). ISO 26000 and the Standardization of Strategic Management Processes for Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7), 442-455. Doi:10.1002/bse.1751

Jassem, S., Zakaria, Z., & Che Azmi, A. (2021). Sustainability balanced scorecard architecture and environmental performance outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(5), 1728-1760. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0582

Khan, S. A. R., Ponce, P., & Yu, Z. (2021). Technological innovation and environmental taxes toward a carbon-free economy: An empirical study in the context of COP-21. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, 113418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113418

Koche, J. C. (2011). Fundamentos de metodología científica. Vozes.

López-Roldán, P. D., & Fachelli, S. I. (2015). Metodología de construcción de tipologías para el análisis de la realidad social. Universidad de Buenos Aires. https://www.sociales.uba.ar/wp-content/uploads/Fachelli-Lopez-Roldan1.pdf

Masera, O., Astier, M., & López-Ridaura, S. (2018). Aspectos metodológicos en el análisis y evaluación de sistemas de manejo de recursos naturales. MESMIS. Ganadería, Desarrollo Sostenible y Medio Ambiente. Módulo IV. Mundiprensa Gira Unam.

Pereira, A. S. et al (2018). Metodología da pesquisa científica. UAB/NTE/UFSM.

Reyes, V. M., Gonzabay, J. C., Herrera, G. A., Deza, C. A., (2022). Factores determinantes de la sostenibilidad en una empresa cañicultora del Ecuador. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales de la Universidad del Zulia (LUZ). XXVIII, (1), ISSN 1315- 9518 y ISSN (e) 2477-9431. DOI:10.31876/rcs.v28i1.37692

Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. (2014). Sustainability development for supply chain management in U.S. petroleum industry by DEA environmental assessment. Energy Economics, 46, 360-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.022

Published

2024-10-24

How to Cite

Gutiérrez Quiñónez, T. V., Reyes, V. M. ., Lugo Bustillos, J. K., García Bustillos, M. A., & Sequera Morales, A. G. . (2024). Strategies for social responsibility and sustainability: a comparative study from a planning perspective. Prohominum, 6(4), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.47606/ACVEN/PH0282

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>