Considerations on the deposit of owed amounts as a requirement for filing exceptions to coercive measures and the principle of free access to justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47606/ACVEN/PH0303

Keywords:

coercive, exceptions, gratuity, justice

Abstract

This study examines the provision established in the General Organic Code of Procedures regarding the requirement to deposit 10% of the owed amounts to suspend coercive execution, assessing its compatibility with the constitutional right to free access to justice. The research was conducted from a qualitative perspective, primarily utilizing document analysis as a tool for the collection and subsequent analysis of the gathered inputs. The findings identify barriers suggested by legal doctrine that may arise when implementing the right to access justice. Furthermore, this study discusses the interpretation made by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador regarding this provision, based on the data obtained. Consequently, this paper provides insights that offer new perspectives on the issue addressed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Código Civil. (2005). Registro Oficial Suplemento 46.

Código Orgánico Administrativo. (2017). Registro Oficial Suplemento 31.

Código Orgánico General de Procesos. (2015). Registro Oficial Suplemento 506.

Constitución de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Registro Oficial 449.

Díaz de Salas, S., Mendoza Martínez, V., & Porras Morales, C. (2011). Una guía para la elaboración de estudios de caso. Razón y Palabra.

Domènech, F. A. (s.f.). V Lex. Obtenido de https://practico-civil.es/vid/gratuidad- justicia-380391330

Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. (03 de Febrero de 2009). Registro Oficial Suplemento 52.

Ospina, G. (2005). Régimen General de las Obligaciones. Bogotá: TEMIS.

RAE. (s.f.). Obtenido de https://dle.rae.es/excepci%C3%B3n

Stake, R. (1998). Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid: Morata

Published

2024-10-24

How to Cite

Montero Pacheco, S. G. (2024). Considerations on the deposit of owed amounts as a requirement for filing exceptions to coercive measures and the principle of free access to justice. Prohominum, 6(4), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.47606/ACVEN/PH0303