Empathetic connection between public transportation and university quality of life: legal implications for student well-being

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47606/ACVEN/PH0466

Palabras clave:

Transporte público, empatía, calidad de vida universitaria, bienestar estudiantil, marco legal.

Resumen

Digital transformation and increasing urban mobility challenges have highlighted the importance of public transportation as a determinant of university students’ well-being. This study analyzes the relationship between empathetic connection in public transportation services and university quality of life in the Ancash region of Peru, incorporating a legal perspective on student mobility rights. A quantitative, correlational, non-experimental, and cross-sectional design was employed. Data were collected from a sample of 224 students enrolled in business sciences programs using structured questionnaires. The reliability of the instruments was confirmed through Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient. Pearson correlation analysis revealed statistically significant positive relationships between empathetic service dimensions empathy, personalized attention, flexibility, and understanding of users’ concerns and students’ quality of life (p < .001). Among these, empathy in service showed the strongest association. These findings indicate that more empathetic public transportation systems contribute to improved student well-being and reduced stress levels. The study highlights the need to incorporate student-centered approaches into transportation policies and supports the recognition of dignified mobility as part of the right to education.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Currie, G., & Delbosc, A. (2010). Exploring public transport usage trends in an ageing population. Transportation, 37(1), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9222-x

Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2011). The spatial context of transport disadvantage. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1130–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.04.004

Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2007). Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 10(3), 21–34.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Sirgy, M. J., Grzeskowiak, S., & Rahtz, D. (2007). Quality of college life (QCL): Developing and validating a measure of student well-being. Social Indicators Research, 80(2), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-5921-9

UNESCO. (2019). Global education monitoring report. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org

United Nations. (2020). The sustainable development goals report 2020. United Nations. https://unstats.un.org

Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2018). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-03-21

Cómo citar

Figueroa-Quito , S. I. . . ., Norabuena-Mendoza , C. H. . ., Trujillo-Navarro , N. L. . . . ., Robles-Espinoza , R. E. . . ., & Robles-Espinoza , F. B. . . . (2026). Empathetic connection between public transportation and university quality of life: legal implications for student well-being. Prohominum, 8(1), 652–662. https://doi.org/10.47606/ACVEN/PH0466

Número

Sección

Artículos

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.